Apr 05, 2022
In Welcome to the Tech Forum
The spread of conspiracy theories about the origin and management of the covid-19 pandemic is more a product of fragmentation and cracks between social groups than of institutions that develop and disseminate them in a centralized and planned manner. Its success is also due to the dynamics of social networks, which tend to form similar and limited groups: sociabilities have been reduced, locked in small groups with less and less dialogue with the outside and less and less openness to different arguments and exchanges. open. The conspiracy theories conveyed by videos such as Plandemic , produced in the United States, or Hold Up , in France, combine scientific discourses, expert opinions, certain arguments from distant religious references, in a scheme that casts doubt on both. They offer the viewer an interpretive key based on criticism and the construction of new Whatsapp Mobile Number List accused of being anachronistic, and the characteristics of the action of science, trial-error, experiment, test, are enunciated as evidence of its failure. The problem here is not the arguments, but the capacity of institutions to produce legitimate discourses: the very authority of scientific, religious, political, and social institutions is being questioned. The vindication of freedom is reduced to the individual and is concentrated on him, becoming the banner of self-centered discourses. Conspiracy theories manage to channel anger and propose arguments tailored to suspicions and frustrations. They find definite culprits, motivations that close: it's like reading crime novels or police movies, the mystery is solved, leaving us the clarity of knowledge and eliminating uncertainty and doubt. The problem is precisely in the breakdown of securities: religion and science knew how to promise certainties in a world that can no longer show them.